The Dakota Access pipeline (DAPL)- a mammoth project of $3.8 billion dollars has sprung a leak even before being fully operational. While the clean up effort was swift and posed no threat to neighbouring waterways, the incident highlights what indigenous peoples, water protectors and climate activists have spent months fighting the government and militarized police against. The fear is, if while not even at its peak of operational capabilities leaks can happen- what will occur when the pipeline is fully operational?
The Standing Rock Sioux Tribe, whose opposition to the route a half-mile from its reservation sparked months of live-in protests at water protector camps, said the incident proved that the project needs more environmental scrutiny.
“The Dakota Access pipeline has not yet started shipping the proposed half million barrels of oil per day, and we are already seeing confirmed reports of oil spills from the pipeline,” said Standing Rock Sioux Chairman David Archambault II in a statement. “This is what we have said all along: Oil pipelines leak and spill. Our lawsuit challenging this dangerous project is ongoing, and it’s more important than ever for the court to step in and halt additional accidents before they happen—not just for the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe and our resources but also for the 17 million people whose drinking water is at risk.”
The leak, equivalent to two barrels of oil, occurred 100 miles east of the Lake Oahe reservoir section of the Missouri River, which is the tribe’s water supply. Granado told Reuters that the spill occurred in a designated containment area on April 4 while the pipeline was being readied for operation.
Being told that there was nothing to be worried about seemed a matter of saving face to the indigenous people who call the area home, as in very recent memory “given the recent censure of ETP in Ohio for a two-million-gallon drilling-material spill that contaminated wetlands.”
“This spills serves as a reminder that it is not a matter of if a pipeline spills, it’s a matter of when a pipeline spills,” said Dallas Goldtooth, Keep it in the Ground Campaigner for the Indigenous Environmental Network, in a statement in response to the DAPL incident. “The fact that this occurred before Dakota Access even becomes operational is all the more concerning. We fear more spills will come to bear, which is an all too frequent situation with Energy Transfer Partners pipeline projects. As such, eyes of the world are watching and will keep Dakota Access and Energy Transfer Partners accountable.”
Do you think that the spill is being blown out of proportion given that it was small, contained and addressed with quickly? Or it is a sign that the fears about the project are legitimate and that a disaster on a larger scale is not only possible, but is actually imminent? Share your thoughts in the comments below.
(Article By Tasha Sharifa)