Sweden’s Parliament rejected 7 motions that would have caused forced vaccinations. The Swedish Parliament decided forced vaccination policies are contrary to their citizens’ constitutional rights. Hopefully every other country in the world will follow their lead and respect the rights of their citizens to decide what is injected into their bodies and the bodies of their children. The National Health Federation-Sweden reported on the issue, and here is a translation of the article via Age of Autism.:

Today, the Riksdag decided on the Social Committee’s report 2016/17: SoU7, which contained a number of measures for public health. What prompted a large proportion of the population to monitor this particular case was that it contained several motions that would pave the way for both more vaccinations and forced vaccination. This was something that involved many, not just those who have opted for vaccine but also people who are vaccinated but who absolutely do not want to see any compulsion.

NHF Sweden sent a letter to the Social Committee, declaring that it would violate our grounds if forced vaccination, or mandatory vaccination as stated in Arkelsten’s exercise. Many others have also sent in letters and many have called Social Affairs and Parliamentary Policy. Riksdag politicians have certainly noticed that there is a massive resistance to all forms of coercion in terms of vaccination.

Trump has historically not supported mandatory vaccines, but it is unknown which way the wind will blow him after meeting with the ridiculously rich Bill Gates.

(Article By Jeremiah Jones)


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here